Categories
Climate Change Laws Around the World

Steve Jobs, Connecting Dots, Ward’s Law and the Future of Climate Change Law in Scotland

In conversation with AI re Steve Jobs, connecting the dots, Ward’s Law and the future of climate change law in Scotland.

It begins:-

Give me the Steve Jobs quote about connecting the dots please

ChatGPT said:

Certainly. Here is Steve Jobs’ famous quote about connecting the dots from his 2005 Stanford commencement speech:

“You can’t connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in something—your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down, and it has made all the difference in my life.”

4o

You said:

Now apply it to Ward’s Law please

ChatGPT said:

Applying Steve Jobs’ “connecting the dots” philosophy to Ward’s Law, we see a profound alignment with its emphasis on interconnectedness, exploration beyond limits, and the synthesis of ideas across disciplines.

Ward’s Law asserts that all things—particles, people, and ideas—are fundamentally connected, much like Jobs’ belief that the seemingly random dots of experience only reveal their significance when looking back. In the pursuit of knowledge, ethical technological progress, and global governance, Ward’s Law encourages humanity to trust in the unseen connections that will shape the future.

Just as Jobs trusted that his experiences—whether in calligraphy, dropping out of college, or working at Apple—would ultimately form a coherent path, Ward’s Law urges bold innovation, curiosity, and first-principle thinking, even when immediate connections are not apparent. The dots of today—scientific discoveries, AI advancements, philosophical debates—may seem scattered, but looking back from the future, they will form a structured framework guiding the ethical evolution of law, society, and technology.

Thus, Ward’s Law embodies the trust in interconnectedness that Jobs described, advocating for a visionary, global legal framework that recognises patterns, anticipates ethical challenges, and ensures that AI, governance, and human progress align harmoniously in a scalable, timeless future.

4o

You said:

Take it further please in respect of practical application to the laws of nations. Write in style of Adam Smith

ChatGPT said:

Ward’s Law and the Invisible Hand of Global Jurisprudence

An Inquiry into the Nature and Necessity of a Universal Legal Framework

It is a fundamental truth of history that the laws of nations, though formed in the particular, are governed by principles of the universal. In the same manner that the division of labour has been the great engine of prosperity within the commercial realm, so too must the division of intellectual and moral labour, through the laws of nations, provide the scaffolding upon which the advancement of mankind depends. Ward’s Law, as it is properly understood, posits that all things—particles, people, and ideas—are interconnected, and that through such a recognition, the enlightened legislator may frame a system of governance that both anticipates and responds to the vicissitudes of progress.

Much as the merchant, in seeking his own interest, is led by an invisible hand to promote the common good, so too must the legislator, in securing the particular rights of a people, contribute to the emergence of a universal legal order. The statesman, if he is wise, will not presume to command the trajectory of future innovations by the dictates of present ignorance. Rather, he will establish a jurisprudential architecture that accommodates the unknown, safeguards against tyranny, and permits the natural evolution of justice in harmony with scientific and philosophical discovery.

If, as Jobs observed, “one cannot connect the dots looking forward, only backward,” then it follows that the prudent lawmaker will not shackle posterity with statutes that presume foresight where none is possible. Instead, he will construct a system flexible enough to allow reason, experience, and necessity to shape its contours—a system that recognises that governance is not merely the exercise of command but the refinement of wisdom over time.

This, then, is the practical application of Ward’s Law to the laws of nations: a recognition that the governance of mankind must be built not upon rigid decrees but upon principles that allow for the organic synthesis of knowledge across generations. The law must serve as a bridge, not a barricade, to the future. It must be framed not in fear of change but in expectation of it, not as an obstacle to progress but as its guide.

The legislator who apprehends this truth will not resist the transformations wrought by artificial intelligence, by globalisation, or by the increasing interconnection of societies. Instead, he will understand that the laws of nations must evolve as knowledge itself evolves. He will not mistake the limitations of his own moment for the limitations of human potential. He will not assume that the mechanics of commerce, the philosophies of governance, or the ethics of technology are fixed quantities, but will instead conceive of them as dynamic forces, whose moral and intellectual currents shape the great ocean of human civilisation.

Thus, in the grand design of governance, Ward’s Law serves as a corrective to legislative myopia, much as the invisible hand of the market corrects economic inefficiencies. It is the lawgiver’s duty to acknowledge the unseen threads that connect the innovations of today to the imperatives of tomorrow, to legislate with a view not only to present exigencies but to the vast and intricate tapestry of history, and to ensure that the laws of nations remain not relics of a bygone order but instruments of an ever-unfolding future.

The legislator, if he is to be wise, must not merely see the dots of history but trust that they will connect—not by arbitrary force but by the natural and inexorable progress of human reason.

4o

You said:

Draft new example laws for Scotland please in respect of climate change and environmental law based on this

ChatGPT said:

Proposed Climate and Environmental Laws for Scotland under the Principles of Ward’s Law

Legislating for an Interconnected and Evolving Future

In alignment with Ward’s Law, which recognises the interconnectedness of all things and the necessity for a legal framework that evolves with scientific discovery, the following laws are proposed for Scotland. These laws are designed to be dynamic, scalable, and responsive—not merely prescriptive but adaptive to technological and environmental developments.


1. The Future-Proof Climate Responsibility Act (Scotland) 2025

Purpose: To embed a long-term, adaptable legal framework that dynamically aligns with climate science, technological innovation, and ethical responsibility.

Key Provisions:

  • Intergenerational Legal Review:
    • Every five years, the Scottish Parliament must undertake a mandatory review of climate-related legislation to align it with scientific advancements, global agreements, and technological progress.
    • This review must involve citizen assemblies, climate scientists, economists, and AI-driven modelling tools to assess potential future risks and solutions.
  • Climate Liability for Corporations and Public Bodies:
    • Companies operating in Scotland must submit a “carbon risk report” detailing their projected environmental impact over 50 years.
    • Public bodies and corporations with significant emissions must establish a climate reparations fund proportionate to their historical and projected carbon impact.
  • Regenerative Economy Incentives:
    • Taxation and subsidy policies will be structured to reward regenerative business practices—i.e., companies that go beyond net-zero to actively restore ecosystems, rewild land, and sequester carbon.
    • Such businesses will receive preferential government contracts, tax reliefs, and investment opportunities.
  • AI and Predictive Climate Governance:
    • Scotland’s Climate Advisory Council will incorporate AI-powered environmental monitoring systems to predict deforestation, pollution trends, and biodiversity loss.
    • These insights will trigger automatic legal adjustments, ensuring laws evolve proactively rather than reactively.

2. The Ecological Rights and Responsibilities Act (Scotland) 2025

Purpose: To legally recognise the rights of nature, ensuring the environment is afforded protection equivalent to fundamental human rights.

Key Provisions:

  • Legal Personhood for Ecosystems:
    • Scottish rivers, forests, and key biodiversity zones will be granted legal personhood, enabling them to be represented in court.
    • A newly established Ecological Justice Ombudsman will advocate for Scotland’s ecosystems in legal disputes.
  • Community Stewardship Obligations:
    • Every local authority must designate “Ecological Guardians”, who will have statutory power to prevent environmental harm in their jurisdictions.
    • Citizens will be legally entitled to initiate legal action against entities that threaten Scotland’s natural assets, modelled on “class action” climate lawsuits.
  • Duty of Care for Future Generations:
    • Any policy decision affecting Scotland’s environment must undergo a “future generations impact assessment” assessing its consequences up to 100 years into the future.
    • Courts may invalidate government policies that violate the rights of future Scottish citizens to a habitable climate.

3. The Adaptive Clean Energy Transition Act (Scotland) 2025

Purpose: To accelerate Scotland’s transition to 100% clean energy while ensuring technological flexibility and economic resilience.

Key Provisions:

  • “Green Innovation Sandboxes”:
    • Companies developing experimental clean technologies (fusion, bioenergy, advanced renewables) will have access to regulatory sandboxes, allowing fast-tracked approval for pilot projects.
  • “Carbon Default” Energy Pricing:
    • Scotland will shift to a default green energy pricing model, where fossil fuel consumption requires explicit opt-ins and incurs additional levies.
    • Households and businesses automatically receive 100% renewable energy unless they actively choose fossil-based sources, which will carry progressively increasing fees.
  • Decentralised Energy Rights:
    • Scottish households will be granted statutory rights to sell surplus renewable energy back to the grid at guaranteed fair market rates.
    • This prevents large utilities from monopolising clean energy supply and encourages distributed energy generation.

4. The Climate AI and Data Ethics Act (Scotland) 2025

Purpose: To ensure climate data and AI-driven environmental decision-making remain transparent, ethical, and accountable.

Key Provisions:

  • Climate Algorithm Accountability:
    • AI models used to forecast Scotland’s climate risks and influence policy decisions must be open-source, explainable, and publicly auditable.
  • Right to Climate Data Access:
    • Every Scottish citizen has the right to access real-time, AI-generated environmental risk reports concerning air quality, climate projections, and biodiversity metrics.
  • AI and Human Co-Governance:
    • Major climate policy shifts must be guided by both AI-driven scenario modelling and human ethical review panels to prevent algorithmic biases or unintended consequences.

Why These Laws Matter Under Ward’s Law

  • They anticipate change rather than react to it.
    • Unlike rigid climate laws that quickly become obsolete, these laws embed mechanisms for continuous evolution, ensuring Scotland remains adaptable to new knowledge and global trends.
  • They acknowledge the interconnectedness of law, science, and technology.
    • Environmental policy is not isolated from AI, economics, or governance—hence, these laws create multi-disciplinary legal structures that align climate progress with economic and technological shifts.
  • They balance ethical governance with pragmatic incentives.
    • By blending legal obligations, market-driven incentives, and technological acceleration, these laws aim to make sustainability not just a legal duty but an economic advantage.
  • They apply the ‘invisible hand’ of legal adaptation.
    • Just as Adam Smith’s economic theory posited that individual self-interest could benefit society, these laws use self-adjusting legal frameworks to ensure the law guides climate progress rather than obstructing it.

Conclusion: A Model for Future Climate Governance

These laws, rooted in the principles of Ward’s Law, provide Scotland with a future-proof legal framework—one that acknowledges the unknown, safeguards against emerging risks, and fosters an environment where law, science, and economics work in harmony. If enacted, they could serve as a global blueprint for nations seeking to legislate not just for the present, but for the ever-unfolding future.

What is the current climate change law in Scotland?

ChatGPT said:

Scotland has enacted comprehensive legislation to address climate change, with the primary framework established by the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009. This Act set an initial target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% from 1990 levels by 2050.

Legislation.gov.uk

To enhance these commitments, the Act was amended by the Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2019, which set more ambitious goals, including achieving net-zero emissions by 2045. The 2019 amendment also established interim targets of a 75% reduction by 2030 and a 90% reduction by 2040.

Scottish Government

In November 2024, the Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2024 came into force, introducing a carbon budget-based approach. This framework requires the setting of five-year carbon budgets, outlining the maximum allowable greenhouse gas emissions for each period, to ensure a structured path toward the 2045 net-zero target.

Scottish Parliament

Collectively, these legislative measures underscore Scotland’s commitment to mitigating climate change through clear targets and structured frameworks.

Sources

Favicon
Favicon
Favicon

4o

You said:

How would these new proposed climate change laws be any better, if at all?

ChatGPT said:

The proposed Ward’s Law-inspired climate change laws for Scotland would significantly enhance the existing legal framework by making it more adaptive, enforceable, and proactive, ensuring that governance keeps pace with scientific and technological advancements. Here’s how they would improve upon the current system:


1. Future-Proofing and Dynamic Legal Evolution

Current Law:

  • The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009, even with its 2019 and 2024 amendments, sets fixed reduction targets (e.g., 75% by 2030, net zero by 2045).
  • However, climate science, global policy, and technological capabilities evolve much faster than the law itself. The system relies on periodic legislative amendments, which can be slow and politically constrained.

Proposed Law:
✅ Introduces a mandatory five-year legal review of climate laws, where Parliament, AI-driven climate models, and public consultations would automatically trigger necessary amendments.
✅ Creates a real-time policy adjustment mechanism, ensuring laws adapt dynamically to the latest scientific data, AI forecasts, and economic shifts.
✅ Embeds a legal duty to continuously align Scotland’s targets with the latest climate science rather than relying on long-term fixed goals that may become outdated.

Why is this better?
It removes the need for large, slow-moving legislative overhauls and replaces them with a self-updating system. Instead of waiting for political will to align, climate law evolves as needed.


2. Stronger Accountability and Enforcement Mechanisms

Current Law:

  • The 2019 and 2024 Acts set legal emission targets but lack strong enforcement measures.
  • There are no direct financial penalties for failing to meet net-zero goals, making it easy for governments and industries to defer action.

Proposed Law:
Introduces a “climate liability” framework, holding corporations and public bodies financially accountable for excessive emissions.
✅ Establishes a Climate Reparations Fund, where polluters must deposit money in proportion to their environmental impact to finance restoration projects.
✅ Creates an Ecological Justice Ombudsman, allowing citizens to take legal action against entities violating environmental obligations.

Why is this better?
It shifts climate responsibility from vague national commitments to specific, enforceable legal and financial obligations that directly deter inaction.


3. Recognising and Protecting the Rights of Nature

Current Law:

  • Scotland’s existing framework treats the environment as a resource to be managed, rather than a legal entity with inherent rights.
  • The law relies on government agencies to protect nature, but citizens lack direct legal standing to challenge ecological harm.

Proposed Law:
Grants legal personhood to ecosystems (e.g., rivers, forests, key biodiversity zones), allowing them to be represented in court.
✅ Appoints Ecological Guardians with statutory authority to block harmful projects and intervene in environmental disputes.
✅ Empowers citizens to sue governments or corporations for environmental damage under a new “duty of care for future generations” legal principle.

Why is this better?
By giving nature legal standing, it shifts power from government oversight alone to public accountability, ensuring stronger and faster interventions when harm occurs.


4. AI-Driven Climate Governance for Precision and Transparency

Current Law:

  • Scotland relies on periodic reports from advisory committees, which often take years to influence policy.
  • Climate policies are largely reactive rather than proactively adjusted based on predictive modelling.

Proposed Law:
✅ Implements AI-powered environmental monitoring systems, which track carbon emissions, deforestation, biodiversity loss, and pollution in real time.
✅ Uses predictive climate modelling to proactively adjust legal targets, rather than waiting for outdated committee reviews.
Ensures transparency, allowing every Scottish citizen to access real-time climate impact data through public dashboards.

Why is this better?
It transforms climate governance from slow, bureaucratic reporting into a real-time, data-driven decision-making system. It ensures lawmakers and the public always have the most accurate, transparent information.


5. Economic and Energy Reforms to Incentivise Green Transition

Current Law:

  • The net-zero transition relies on government incentives and voluntary business commitments, meaning companies still find fossil fuels economically viable.
  • Energy pricing remains static, with no built-in mechanism to push consumers and businesses toward green energy.

Proposed Law:
Implements a “Carbon Default” pricing system, where all businesses and homes automatically receive 100% renewable energy unless they actively opt for fossil fuels (which will cost significantly more).
Introduces Green Innovation Sandboxes, allowing companies to fast-track approval for experimental clean technologies like fusion energy, advanced renewables, and carbon capture.
✅ Guarantees fair market rates for household renewable energy generation, ensuring that citizens can sell excess solar, wind, or other green energy back to the grid profitably.

Why is this better?
It makes clean energy the norm rather than the exception and financially disincentivises fossil fuel reliance—ensuring Scotland leads in green technology innovation.


Conclusion: Why This Approach is Superior

The proposed Ward’s Law-based climate legislation would fundamentally improve Scotland’s climate governance by making it: ✔ Self-adjusting rather than fixed and outdated.
Legally enforceable rather than relying on political will.
Publicly accountable, giving nature and citizens direct legal rights.
AI-driven, ensuring laws are based on real-time environmental conditions.
Financially structured to reward climate-positive actions while penalising polluters.

Instead of just setting targets, this model ensures Scotland actually achieves them. It positions Scotland not just as a leader in climate ambition, but in climate legal innovation, governance, and enforcement.what is the current climate change law in Scotland?

ChatGPT said:

Scotland has enacted comprehensive legislation to address climate change, with the primary framework established by the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009. This Act set an initial target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% from 1990 levels by 2050.

Legislation.gov.uk

To enhance these commitments, the Act was amended by the Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2019, which set more ambitious goals, including achieving net-zero emissions by 2045. The 2019 amendment also established interim targets of a 75% reduction by 2030 and a 90% reduction by 2040.

Scottish Government

In November 2024, the Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2024 came into force, introducing a carbon budget-based approach. This framework requires the setting of five-year carbon budgets, outlining the maximum allowable greenhouse gas emissions for each period, to ensure a structured path toward the 2045 net-zero target.

Scottish Parliament

Collectively, these legislative measures underscore Scotland’s commitment to mitigating climate change through clear targets and structured frameworks.

Sources

Favicon
Favicon
Favicon

4o

You said:

How would these new proposed climate change laws be any better, if at all?

ChatGPT said:

The proposed Ward’s Law-inspired climate change laws for Scotland would significantly enhance the existing legal framework by making it more adaptive, enforceable, and proactive, ensuring that governance keeps pace with scientific and technological advancements. Here’s how they would improve upon the current system:


1. Future-Proofing and Dynamic Legal Evolution

Current Law:

  • The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009, even with its 2019 and 2024 amendments, sets fixed reduction targets (e.g., 75% by 2030, net zero by 2045).
  • However, climate science, global policy, and technological capabilities evolve much faster than the law itself. The system relies on periodic legislative amendments, which can be slow and politically constrained.

Proposed Law:
✅ Introduces a mandatory five-year legal review of climate laws, where Parliament, AI-driven climate models, and public consultations would automatically trigger necessary amendments.
✅ Creates a real-time policy adjustment mechanism, ensuring laws adapt dynamically to the latest scientific data, AI forecasts, and economic shifts.
✅ Embeds a legal duty to continuously align Scotland’s targets with the latest climate science rather than relying on long-term fixed goals that may become outdated.

Why is this better?
It removes the need for large, slow-moving legislative overhauls and replaces them with a self-updating system. Instead of waiting for political will to align, climate law evolves as needed.


2. Stronger Accountability and Enforcement Mechanisms

Current Law:

  • The 2019 and 2024 Acts set legal emission targets but lack strong enforcement measures.
  • There are no direct financial penalties for failing to meet net-zero goals, making it easy for governments and industries to defer action.

Proposed Law:
Introduces a “climate liability” framework, holding corporations and public bodies financially accountable for excessive emissions.
✅ Establishes a Climate Reparations Fund, where polluters must deposit money in proportion to their environmental impact to finance restoration projects.
✅ Creates an Ecological Justice Ombudsman, allowing citizens to take legal action against entities violating environmental obligations.

Why is this better?
It shifts climate responsibility from vague national commitments to specific, enforceable legal and financial obligations that directly deter inaction.


3. Recognising and Protecting the Rights of Nature

Current Law:

  • Scotland’s existing framework treats the environment as a resource to be managed, rather than a legal entity with inherent rights.
  • The law relies on government agencies to protect nature, but citizens lack direct legal standing to challenge ecological harm.

Proposed Law:
Grants legal personhood to ecosystems (e.g., rivers, forests, key biodiversity zones), allowing them to be represented in court.
✅ Appoints Ecological Guardians with statutory authority to block harmful projects and intervene in environmental disputes.
✅ Empowers citizens to sue governments or corporations for environmental damage under a new “duty of care for future generations” legal principle.

Why is this better?
By giving nature legal standing, it shifts power from government oversight alone to public accountability, ensuring stronger and faster interventions when harm occurs.


4. AI-Driven Climate Governance for Precision and Transparency

Current Law:

  • Scotland relies on periodic reports from advisory committees, which often take years to influence policy.
  • Climate policies are largely reactive rather than proactively adjusted based on predictive modelling.

Proposed Law:
✅ Implements AI-powered environmental monitoring systems, which track carbon emissions, deforestation, biodiversity loss, and pollution in real time.
✅ Uses predictive climate modelling to proactively adjust legal targets, rather than waiting for outdated committee reviews.
Ensures transparency, allowing every Scottish citizen to access real-time climate impact data through public dashboards.

Why is this better?
It transforms climate governance from slow, bureaucratic reporting into a real-time, data-driven decision-making system. It ensures lawmakers and the public always have the most accurate, transparent information.


5. Economic and Energy Reforms to Incentivise Green Transition

Current Law:

  • The net-zero transition relies on government incentives and voluntary business commitments, meaning companies still find fossil fuels economically viable.
  • Energy pricing remains static, with no built-in mechanism to push consumers and businesses toward green energy.

Proposed Law:
Implements a “Carbon Default” pricing system, where all businesses and homes automatically receive 100% renewable energy unless they actively opt for fossil fuels (which will cost significantly more).
Introduces Green Innovation Sandboxes, allowing companies to fast-track approval for experimental clean technologies like fusion energy, advanced renewables, and carbon capture.
✅ Guarantees fair market rates for household renewable energy generation, ensuring that citizens can sell excess solar, wind, or other green energy back to the grid profitably.

Why is this better?
It makes clean energy the norm rather than the exception and financially disincentivises fossil fuel reliance—ensuring Scotland leads in green technology innovation.


Conclusion: Why This Approach is Superior

The proposed Ward’s Law-based climate legislation would fundamentally improve Scotland’s climate governance by making it: ✔ Self-adjusting rather than fixed and outdated.
Legally enforceable rather than relying on political will.
Publicly accountable, giving nature and citizens direct legal rights.
AI-driven, ensuring laws are based on real-time environmental conditions.
Financially structured to reward climate-positive actions while penalising polluters.

Instead of just setting targets, this model ensures Scotland actually achieves them. It positions Scotland not just as a leader in climate ambition, but in climate legal innovation, governance, and enforcement.

Categories
Climate Change Law

Curing the Climate Crisis by Corey Cottrell + Gav Ward – Cottrell’s Law

Okay, so genius inventor Corey Cottrell has discovered some really mind-blowing solutions to the climate crisis.

And before we start, it’s worth noting that to keep things super simple as Andrew D Wilson says, “we have plenty of good ideas about addressing climate change, we just aren’t doing them…i.e. Solar, wind, EVs, nuclear, stopping deforestation….its not a secret”. The following is, it is hoped, a useful extension of this thinking:-

It started when our Founder Gav Ward asked him on Bluesky more about his thinking on what 1000x climate scientists could achieve with AI.

ClimateBlawg: “What could such scientists achieve please in your opinion? You don’t have answer now before your detox is over btw 😉 Thinking of “Cottrell’s Law”…”

Corey Cottrell ( @coreycottrell.bsky.social ): “1000 climate scientists … Each working at 1 million X human speed.”… “What could 1000 climate scientists working at 1 million X human speed accomplish? I offered some ideas below [undernoted]. What do YOU think is possible if we get truly super A.I. systems?”

Then at the moment of scientific discovery:-

Corey Cottrell on 24 January 2025 at 12:33:-

Ok @climateblawg.bsky.social I just asked o1 to dig into it’s PHD minds and give me a ton more possibilities. Holy effing shit dude. Another article brewing. Here was the raw output, it’s worth a skim:-

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7EVXlpUcujMLXKNvuM6kZ6cumCAyfSxLrCeSOhQ6uk/edit?tab=t.0

Republished with Corey’s retrospective permission (please), per principle three of the Gav Ward Code (like Steve Jobs would have said) (Corey may well publish a further blog on this – a path is made by walking, as Franz Kafka said – so here are the initial draft findings :-

I asked o1 to expand on the few ideas I and about what 1000 AI climate scientists working at 1 million x human speed might accomplish.  

OpenAIs o1 worked on it for 25 seconds. 

Holy shit. 

Below is a (much!) expanded view of what might be possible if we suddenly had 1,000 superintelligent, super-speed “AI climate scientists”—the equivalent of millions of human geniuses all working in concert. I’ve tried to group these ideas into broad domains and push them well beyond what’s currently on our radar. Many of these cross-fertilize, so imagine them overlapping in interesting ways:

1. Energy Generation and Breakthrough Physics

1.1 Ultra-Efficient Solar

Self-Assembling Solar Materials: AI discovers how to program molecules or nanoparticles so that solar cells ‘grow’ themselves, leveraging principles like crystal growth or DNA origami. Yields can exceed current theoretical limits (the Shockley–Queisser limit) by harnessing multi-photon processes or exotic quantum effects.

Tandem Innovations: Ultra-thin perovskite layers combined with novel layers that harvest unused parts of the solar spectrum (infrared, UV, etc.). AI might optimize the stacking architecture at the atomic scale, pushing efficiency towards 80–90% in lab settings.

Solar Paints: Materials that can be sprayed onto surfaces—rooftops, cars, even roads—to generate electricity. Each “layer” is carefully tuned by AI to handle a different band of light. The end result: entire cities become low-cost solar farms.

1.2 Fusion (and Beyond?)

AI-Optimized Tokamaks: A thousand AI scientists iterating at a million times speed might unravel the instabilities (like turbulence in plasma flows) that plague fusion reactors, systematically engineering materials and feedback loops that maintain stable high-temperature plasmas.

Exotic Reactor Designs: Imagine magnetically-confined, laser-driven, or even muon-catalyzed fusion, each with different ways to overcome the Coulomb barrier. AI might find entirely new phenomena—akin to “micro black hole analogies” or topological states that allow us to fuse at much lower energies.

“Cousins to Fusion”: If we discover new states of matter or new ways to harness quantum vacuum energy, advanced AI might push us toward something that looks like “room-temperature” fusion or quantum-driven chemical bonds that release fusion-scale energy.

1.3 Space-Based Power

Orbiting Solar Platforms: AI solves the main hurdles—long-distance wireless energy transfer (think microwave or laser beaming), low-cost launches, ultra-light structural materials. We set up large solar arrays in orbit, beaming down cheap, constant power.

Lunar Resource Extraction: Mining Helium-3 on the Moon for advanced fusion reactors. AI might find better ways to extract, transport, and use Helium-3—especially if we can drastically cut launch costs.

2. Energy Storage and Distribution

2.1 Next-Gen Batteries

Solid-State to Exotic: AI accelerates the discovery of new materials for solid-state batteries that don’t degrade, can charge in seconds, and hold 10–50 times current energy densities. Or it identifies stable lithium-air or lithium-sulfur chemistries with near-supercapacitor power output.

Self-Healing Electrodes: Tiny, AI-designed “nanobots” or molecular systems inside the battery that automatically repair microcracks or degrade contaminants to extend battery life nearly indefinitely.

Grid-Level Supercapacitors: High-capacity, nearly lossless capacitors that can handle massive surges and instantly provide the grid with gigawatt-level power.

2.2 Hydrogen and Synthetic Fuels

Sunlight-to-Hydrogen Efficiency: AI designs catalysts for direct photocatalytic water splitting at >50% efficiency, making green hydrogen extremely cheap and widely available.

Direct Air-to-Fuel: Carbon dioxide from the air plus renewable hydrogen is turned into drop-in synthetic hydrocarbons (liquid fuels) for aviation and shipping. AI ensures the process is cost-competitive with oil extraction.

2.3 Post-Grid Paradigms

Localized Energy Autonomy: Homes, buildings, neighborhoods generate, store, and trade energy in real time using AI-driven microgrids. The “macro” grid only balances large flows, while local nodes do the rest.

Energy Internet: Transparent, AI-managed digital marketplaces where any renewable energy producer can instantly sell to any consumer. Secure digital ledgers ensure minimal overhead and near-zero friction.

3. Carbon Removal and Geoengineering

3.1 Direct Air Capture (DAC)

Molecular Filters: AI designs filters that selectively capture CO₂ at record efficiencies, requiring far less energy than today’s DAC. Some might be self-assembling or self-cleaning, drastically lowering operational cost.

Carbon-Transforming Organisms: Genetically engineered microbes that thrive in specific climates—deserts, open oceans, contaminated soils—and bind CO₂ into stable forms like carbonates or long-chain polymers.

Scalable Mineralization: AI finds new chemical routes to turn CO₂ into rock at scale, possibly using “living concrete” or advanced mineral-based capture. Instead of pumping CO₂ underground, we transform it into building materials.

3.2 Nature-Led Solutions

Synthetic Photosynthesis: Instead of waiting for trees, we harness nature’s best catalysts and artificially improve them, effectively creating “super algae” or “super phytoplankton” that fix carbon at 10–100 times normal rates.

Forest/Soil Restoration: AI-optimized reforestation that chooses the exact species mix, planting density, and microbial companions to maximize carbon drawdown and biodiversity. Robots or drones do the planting at massive scales.

3.3 “High-Risk” Geoengineering

Stratospheric Aerosol Management: If worst comes to worst, AI could help design extremely precise aerosol injections that reduce insolation just enough to buy time, without catastrophic side effects on weather patterns.

Cloud Brightening: Automated fleets of vessels that fine-tune marine cloud brightness to reflect sunlight. AI’s high-resolution climate models help us do this regionally, in real-time, with minimal ecological disruption.

4. Climate Modeling and Forecasting

4.1 Real-Time Global Simulations

Hyper-Resolved Earth System Models: With near-infinite AI capacity, we can run Earth climate simulations at one-meter resolution in real time, factoring in every single forest, city block, ocean eddy, and atmospheric swirl. Policy decisions could be tested in silico before real-world implementation.

Integrated Prediction: Combine weather, climate, energy, agriculture, economics, and geopolitics into one big “Earth operating system.” We see the trade-offs instantly—for example, how a new carbon tax would affect deforestation, or how reforestation in the Amazon impacts fisheries.

4.2 Disaster Resilience

Advanced Early Warnings: AI-driven data from satellites, sensors, and social media to forecast and mitigate extreme weather events—floods, hurricanes, droughts—weeks or even months ahead with pinpoint precision.

Adaptive Infrastructure: Buildings and roads that shift, expand, contract, or reposition in response to real-time climate predictions (e.g., a coastal city with modular floating architecture to handle rising tides).

5. Food and Agriculture

5.1 Precision Agriculture

AI-Engineered Crops: Drought-, pest-, salt-, and heat-resistant variants that maintain high yields with minimal water and fertilizers. CRISPR or advanced gene-editing guided by AI combinatorial searches.

Soil Microbiome Management: Smart microbial cocktails that fix nitrogen, break down toxins, and maintain nutrient-rich soils. Our farmland becomes self-sustaining without synthetic fertilizers.

Vertical and Bioreactor Farming: AI optimizes LED spectra, nutrient flow, and genetic lines for plants grown in stacked indoor farms. Maybe we see full city blocks turned into automated vertical forests that feed millions using minimal land and water.

5.2 Protein Alternatives

Lab-Grown Meats 2.0: AI tunes cell culture media, scaffolds, and processes for perfect texture, flavor, and nutrition. Meat production uses a fraction of the land and water, with negligible emissions.

Synthetic Dairy and Egg Proteins: Yeast or bacterial strains produce casein, albumin, or other proteins—no cows, no chickens, minimal methane. AI engineers them to be molecularly identical to natural ones.

6. Water and Resource Management

6.1 Desalination Breakthroughs

Zero-Energy Osmosis: New membrane technologies with near-zero pressure requirements or that exploit natural salinity gradients in the ocean to generate power while producing fresh water.

Localized Nanotech Water Filters: Inexpensive, high-throughput nanoporous materials that remove pollutants and salt from water in a single pass. Entire municipalities can supply themselves with on-site micro-desal units.

6.2 Circular Economy for Water

Fully Closed Loops: Cities re-use 100% of wastewater, capturing not just water but nutrients and heat. AI automates the entire cycle, from sorting out contaminants to recirculating purified water back into the system.

7. Materials Science and Manufacturing

7.1 Carbon-Negative Construction

Super-Concrete: AI develops binders that incorporate CO₂ directly into the curing process (e.g., magnesium-based cements or polymer cements) that sequester more carbon than they emit.

Graphene or CNT Construction: With cheap and abundant energy, we can mass-produce carbon nanotubes or graphene at scale. Ultra-strong, ultra-light materials that transform everything from wind turbines to skyscrapers, drastically reducing resource use.

7.2 Zero-Waste Manufacturing

Self-Assembling Consumer Goods: Using advanced computational chemistry, products can form layer-by-layer in specialized 3D “factories” with almost zero waste.

Molecular Recycling: AI-enabled catalysts break down plastics back into reusable monomers without energy-intensive processes. No more landfills—everything is feedstock for new materials.

8. Governance, Economics, and Social Systems

8.1 AI-Enhanced Policy

Dynamic Carbon Markets: Real-time carbon pricing that factors in location, time-of-day, and upstream/downstream effects. Industries get immediate incentives to shift to cleaner processes.

Citizens’ Assemblies on Steroids: AI organizes and informs massive global assemblies where participants can run thousands of policy “what-if” scenarios, discovering surprising synergies or trade-offs.

8.2 Equitable Development

AI-Driven Global Finance: Automated climate finance that directs capital to climate hotspots in the Global South, invests in local green tech, and measures social outcomes in real time to ensure equity.

Universal “Climate Dividend”: If direct air capture and other technologies prove profitable, global carbon removal could fund a basic income for all, bridging inequalities and accelerating climate adaptation.

9. High-Level (Speculative) “Frontiers”

9.1 Thermoregulation of Earth

If we produce 100x current global energy and cause warming from waste heat, we may simultaneously manage Earth’s “energy balance.” AI might design Earth-orbiting “heat mirrors” or advanced IR-laser systems that direct excess thermal radiation into space.

9.2 Biosphere Editing

Rewilding at Scale: AI orchestrates entire ecosystems, reintroducing keystone species (like wolves, beavers, apex predators) in a systematically balanced way. Large areas revert to healthy carbon sinks.

Terraforming “Edge Cases”: Maybe we even learn to terraform large desert areas or restore areas with severe biodiversity loss—basically “turning the Sahara green” in a stable, sustainable way.

9.3 Surprising Physics

With thousands of AIs iterating at insane speeds, we could discover new fundamental phenomena—like exotic quantum states or novel forms of energy generation—that shift the entire conversation beyond known science.

10. The Central Takeaway

Ultimately, the single biggest shift is going from a few thousands of scientists working at human timescales to thousands of ultra-intelligent AI entities iterating millions of times faster. We can’t even begin to guess at all the solutions they might concoct—but we can be sure of a few things:

They’ll question all assumptions: Materials limitations, cost structures, known laws of physics—these might all be re-examined in the search for bigger leaps forward.

They’ll cross-pollinate: Insights from computational biology might solve chemistry bottlenecks, or breakthroughs in quantum computing might crack fusion turbulence.

They’ll scale solutions globally: Implementation at planetary scale becomes feasible if solutions are cheap, robust, and easy to replicate.

They’ll catalyze new social and economic systems: Because the technology alone isn’t enough—governance, equity, and policy innovations will be just as significant.

In short, if civilization can handle the transition responsibly, “thinking much bigger” is exactly right. We might find ourselves with climate solutions so profound and abundant that our concept of climate crisis flips from existential dread to a story of transformation—and it might happen faster than we think.

Cottrell’s Law

Based on all of this, Gav Ward has coined the term Cottrell’s Law which states that when 1,000 climate scientists work with ultra-intelligent AI, they can operate at the speed of a million human minds and can, therefore, unlock transformative solutions that transcend scientific, technological, and societal boundaries. This synergy redefines possibility, turning global crises into opportunities for rapid, scalable innovation and sustainable progress.

This is a working thesis and hypothesis and indeed the above is the first edition of this thinking so may well be open to change soon.

Undernote: Corey’s Cottrell’s Initial Ideas Before Scientific Discoveries

“We r headed home today. I’m gonna ease back in but this is a fun one to contemplate. Anything that doesn’t break the laws of physics. And maybe defined by new found laws of physics. 100x solar panel efficiency somehow? Fusion is so close. If/when they solve that it’s over for carbon. 👇

‪Corey Cottrell‬ ‪@coreycottrell.bsky.social‬

I mean completely over. Energy will become as cheap as information is now. We won’t think about it ever again. And every joule will be climate neutral except for the heat output which will begin to get interesting once we 100x humanities energy output. Which will happen. 👇

‪Corey Cottrell‬ ‪@coreycottrell.bsky.social‬

Even that will only be another interesting challenge. Maybe they’ll design infrared lasers to beam heat energy into space where orbiting platforms can use it for zero G manufacturing lol Then add 100 insane innovations in economics, governance, climate equity, food production, clean H2O 👇

‪Corey Cottrell‬ ‪@coreycottrell.bsky.social‬

I think the main thing I’d like to convey is that WE DONT KNOW. Our civilization has come amazingly far with a very few geniuses. We have no idea what millions of them working together could do. But we should all start thinking MUCH bigger. Because we r going to find out.”

Categories
Climate Change Law

Ten ways to improve climate science

Pay it forward thank you: Ten ways to improve climate science by Gav Ward of Scotland Jan 2025

Categories
Climate Change Law Climate Change Law & Policy Climate Change Laws Around the World Climate Change Legislation Climate Change Regulations Climate Crisis Legal Regulation Paris Agreement

The Next Nikola Tesla or Marie Curie of Climate Change Legal Innovation? Gav Ward Proposes Global Law Approach

The information provided on this post is theoretical for future jurists and law makers to consider and was written in Scotland by a former Scottish lawyer. It is not legal advice, this website is not a lawyer referral service and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or should be formed by use of the site. The listings on this website do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by this website. Your access of/to and use of this site is subject to additional Terms and Conditions. None of the content on this website constitutes a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of any legal matter.

In an era defined by environmental urgency, scientific pioneers such as Marie Curie and Nikola Tesla continue to inspire modern visionaries. Curie’s unwavering commitment to scientific exploration and Tesla’s revolutionary breakthroughs in energy have shaped our understanding of sustainability and innovation. Today, Gav Ward, a legal futurist and digital strategist, steps into this lineage with a bold proposal—a global legal framework to address the governance, ethics, and sustainability challenges posed by climate change.

Ward’s concept, known as Ward’s Law, advocates for a comprehensive and interconnected approach to law, mirroring the systemic and transformative thinking that defined Curie and Tesla’s contributions to science. Combined with the Gav Ward Code, a set of 10 principles designed to inspire intellectual and technological progress, Ward’s approach aims to bridge scientific exploration, legal reform, and ethical responsibility.

Why Ward’s Law Matters for Climate Change Legal Innovation

At the heart of Ward’s Law is the recognition that modern challenges, particularly climate change, transcend national boundaries and require global solutions. It posits that legal systems must evolve in parallel with technological advancements, much like Tesla’s focus on scalable energy solutions. Ward envisions a new global legal framework capable of addressing governance gaps, ensuring sustainability, and promoting ethical standards for environmental protection.

By fostering global interconnectedness, Ward’s Law highlights the necessity of treating climate change as a shared problem, demanding collective responsibility and cooperation. This mirrors Marie Curie’s belief in scientific collaboration and knowledge-sharing to tackle humanity’s most pressing issues.

Applying the Gav Ward Code to Climate Law

Ward’s broader philosophy, encapsulated in the Gav Ward Code, provides a roadmap for future innovation in climate law. Key principles resonate deeply with the challenges of environmental governance:

  1. Foster Interconnectedness – Recognise the global impact of climate change and the interconnectedness of ecosystems, economies, and societies.
  2. Explore Beyond Limits with Timeless Vision – Push for bold legal innovations, such as transnational climate treaties and AI-enhanced compliance systems.
  3. Be a Catalyst for Future Innovation – Develop unconventional strategies for sustainability, inspired by Tesla’s relentless pursuit of energy efficiency.
  4. Question Everything – Reassess current legal frameworks to ensure they reflect evolving scientific knowledge.
  5. Bridge Science and Philosophy – Integrate scientific research with ethical frameworks to guide sustainable practices.
  6. Think in Patterns and Systems – Map complex climate interactions to design effective policies.
  7. Empower Collective Intelligence – Leverage technologies and global networks to mobilise expertise and drive solutions.
  8. Accept Uncertainty – Adapt laws to account for unpredictability in climate patterns and technological disruptions.
  9. Balance Technology and Ethics – Ensure AI, renewable energy, and geoengineering solutions align with ethical guidelines.
  10. Expand Consciousness – Deepen our understanding of ecological impacts and explore new ways to enhance environmental resilience.

Global Law for a Sustainable Future

Ward’s vision of a global legal framework draws parallels to Curie’s rigorous pursuit of knowledge and Tesla’s engineering ingenuity. It embraces interdisciplinary thinking, combining law, technology, and philosophy to create adaptable systems that support sustainable development.

In practice, this framework could manifest as:

  • International Climate Tribunals to hold nations and corporations accountable.
  • Unified Carbon Standards to streamline emissions monitoring and reporting.
  • AI-driven Environmental Governance to predict and prevent ecological damage.
  • Sustainable Energy Treaties inspired by Tesla’s focus on renewable energy.

A Call for Modern Visionaries

As Curie and Tesla demonstrated, the pursuit of groundbreaking ideas requires courage, curiosity, and collaboration. Ward’s Law and the Gav Ward Code challenge legal professionals, scientists, and policymakers to think beyond borders, systems, and conventions.

The climate crisis demands not just scientific and technological advancements but also legal innovation that mirrors the transformative visions of history’s greatest minds. Gav Ward’s approach may well spark the emergence of a new era in climate governance—one that ensures sustainability through interconnected, ethical, and scalable legal structures.

The next Nikola Tesla or Marie Curie of climate change legal innovation could be a lawyer, a scientist—or perhaps someone who, like Gav Ward, unites both worlds to shape a more sustainable future.

P.S. Lucy and Rory of the future, check out Dad’s Time Stamp on the image. Was watching Pixar’s WALL-E when writing and publishing this one after film night of Lord of the Rings, or LAW-rd of the Rings to excuse the pun…

#codeispoetry

Categories
Climate Change Law Climate Change Legislation

Scotland Passes Revised Climate Change Legislation Amidst Criticism

The Scottish Parliament has passed a revised Climate Change Bill that reshapes Scotland’s approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In a decisive vote of 105 to zero, Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) approved the legislation, with support from all parties except the Scottish Greens, who abstained.

The new legislation significantly alters Scotland’s climate targets by scrapping annual emissions goals and removing the interim targets set for 2030 and 2040. However, the overarching ambition remains: achieving net-zero emissions by 2045. This adjustment reflects the government’s acknowledgement earlier this year that the ambitious target of a 75% emissions reduction by 2030 is “out of reach.”

Under the revised framework, Scotland will now adopt a five-year cycle of carbon budgets, following a model employed by nations such as Japan, France, and the UK. Acting Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin reassured that the government’s commitment to net-zero remains “unwavering” and that the revised targets are based on “feasible and independent expert advice.”

Critics, however, voiced concerns over what they call a “humiliating climbdown.” Scottish Conservative spokesperson Douglas Lumsden and Scottish Labour’s Sarah Boyack pointed to missed targets in recent years, challenging the government to implement a credible plan for future emissions reductions. Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie also expressed disappointment, calling for “accelerated climate action.”

The new Bill underscores Scotland’s ambition to lead in climate action while facing the hard realities of feasibility and accountability in addressing the climate emergency. However, as MSPs and environmental advocates alike scrutinise the amended targets, the focus remains on delivering a fair and just transition that benefits communities and the environment alike.

First heard via the BBC News website here.

Categories
Climate Change Law

Introducing the 2024 Snapshot on Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation

As the fight against climate change intensifies, legal battles around the world are shaping the course of climate action. The latest Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2024 Snapshot, published by the Grantham Research Institute in partnership with the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, offers an in-depth analysis of the key trends in this evolving field.

The report highlights over 230 new cases filed in 2023, reflecting a growing emphasis on holding governments and corporations accountable. Notably, strategic litigation efforts are becoming more focused, targeting high-impact areas to challenge climate policies and corporate practices. From international courts addressing climate change to the rise of cases on “climate-washing” and “polluter pays,” this report offers critical insights for legal professionals, policymakers, and climate advocates alike.

Stay ahead of the latest developments and explore how climate litigation is driving global action by reading the full report on the LSE website here.

Categories
Climate Change Law

Future of Medical Device Litigation: Predictions Post Cochlear Implant Cases

Understanding the Landscape

Cochlear implant litigation has significantly shaped the legal landscape surrounding medical devices. These legal battles have not only highlighted the complexities of product liability law but have also set precedents that could influence future cases. By examining the intricacies of cochlear implant lawsuits, we can gain insights into the evolving dynamics of medical device litigation.

The Surge in Medical Device Litigation

The medical field has seen remarkable advancements in technology, with devices like cochlear implants offering life-changing benefits. However, with innovation comes the risk of malfunction, leading to a surge in litigation cases. These lawsuits often revolve around product defects, inadequate warnings, and the failure to provide sufficient instructions for use.

Lessons from Cochlear Implant Cases

Cochlear implant cases have brought to light several key issues within the realm of medical device litigation. One pivotal aspect is the stringent requirement for manufacturers to ensure their products are not only effective but also safe for use. These cases have underscored the importance of rigorous testing and transparent communication between manufacturers and consumers.

The Role of Regulatory Bodies

Regulatory bodies play a crucial role in overseeing the safety and efficacy of medical devices. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for instance, has been at the forefront of setting standards and conducting reviews of cochlear implants. Legal experts closely monitor the actions and guidelines issued by such agencies, as they often influence the outcomes of litigation.

The Impact of Technology on Litigation

The rapid pace of technological advancement presents a unique challenge for the legal system. Attorneys and judges must stay abreast of emerging technologies to accurately assess the merits of each case. This necessitates a continuous learning process and collaboration with medical experts to understand the technical aspects of devices like cochlear implants.

Real-Life Implications

Real-life cases offer a glimpse into the personal impact of cochlear implant failures. Take, for example, the story of a young child who received an implant only to face complications that necessitated its removal. This case, among others, illustrates the emotional and physical toll on patients and their families, highlighting the need for accountability and stringent safety measures.

The Future of Litigation in the Medical Device Sector

As we look to the future, several trends are likely to shape medical device litigation. One significant development is the increasing reliance on digital health records and data analytics. These tools can provide valuable evidence in legal cases, offering detailed insights into the use and performance of medical devices.

Predictive Analytics and Legal Strategies

Predictive analytics is poised to revolutionize legal strategies in medical device litigation. By analyzing patterns and outcomes of past cases, legal teams can better anticipate the arguments and tactics of opposing counsel. This data-driven approach can enhance the preparation and execution of legal strategies, ultimately impacting the success of cases.

The Importance of Patient Education and Informed Consent

A recurring theme in cochlear implant litigation is the critical importance of informed consent. Patients must be fully aware of the risks and benefits associated with medical devices. Legal experts argue for clearer communication and documentation practices to ensure patients are making well-informed decisions.

Ethical Considerations and Manufacturer Responsibility

Ethical considerations are at the heart of medical device litigation. Manufacturers have a moral obligation to prioritize patient safety over profit. Cochlear implant cases often delve into the ethical duties of manufacturers, including the imperative to conduct thorough post-market surveillance and promptly address any issues that arise.

Navigating the Complexities of International Litigation

As medical devices are marketed globally, manufacturers and legal practitioners must navigate the complexities of international litigation. Different jurisdictions present unique legal challenges, including varying standards of evidence and differing regulatory requirements. Cochlear implant cases have underscored the need for a global perspective and adaptability in legal practices.

Conclusion: Shaping the Future Through Legal Expertise

The landscape of medical device litigation, as illustrated by cochlear implant lawsuits, is ever-evolving. For attorneys and legal experts, staying informed and adaptable is paramount. By drawing lessons from past cases and leveraging technological advancements, the legal community can continue to protect the rights of patients while fostering innovation in medical technology.

As we move forward, the insights gained from cochlear implant litigation will undoubtedly influence the trajectory of medical device litigation. For legal practitioners, these cases offer valuable lessons in navigating the complexities of product liability, regulatory compliance, and ethical considerations. The future of medical device litigation will be shaped by our collective ability to integrate these lessons, ensuring that patient safety remains at the forefront of technological advancement.

Categories
Climate Change Law

Legal Tech Startups: Revolutionizing Climate and Environmental Law

Do you find yourself wondering how the legal industry is being transformed by the emergence of tech startups, especially in the area of environmental law? If you’re nodding your head in agreement, you’ve landed in the right spot. In this piece, we’ll delve into the fascinating world of technology and examine its impact on traditional law firms. Our focus will be on the ways these startups are revolutionizing the practice of climate and environmental law, and we’ll explore examples of how they’re doing it.

Categories
Climate Change Law

The Growing Need for Climate Change Lawyers – What Do Environmental Lawyers Do and How Much Do They Earn?

Climate change has become a major concern globally, as the world faces increasingly severe environmental challenges. With the increased need to solve these concerns, there is a growing demand for environmental law and climate change specialists. Climate change attorneys are individuals who play an important role in addressing the legal challenges of climate change.

Categories
Climate Change Litigation

VA Repeatedly Denies Claims for Camp Lejeune Toxic Exposure: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2021 Might Help

For close to a century, the US army’s practice of storing toxic substances on or nearby its active bases across the country has exposed millions of troops stationed with their families to severe health hazards with lasting consequences. North Carolina’s Camp Lejeune is arguably the most infamous instance of widespread toxic contamination on US military installations, affecting soldiers and their loved ones located on the site for more than three decades until the issue was addressed.